stay-in-reality-liberals

Anonymous asked:

I just cried going through your blog because of how refreshing it is to finally see some common sense. I swear I love tumblr but it is difficult to constantly see liberals views. Especially lately with Ferguson. OH NO A 300 POUND BLACK GUY WHO JUST SHOVED AROUND A STORE OWNER AND STOLE FROM HIM AND THEN STRUGGLED WITH AN OFFICER FOR HIS GUN THEN REFUSED TO SUBMIT GOT SHOT BY WHAT HAPPENED TO BE A WHITE POLICE OFFICER! IT MUST BE RACISM! BOOHOO POLICE BRUTALITY THIS UNARMED TEENS THAT

stay-in-reality-liberals answered:

Thanks. Just remember this tip of advice when you go about this website and you will be fine.

People are idiots.

stoned-feminist

stoned-feminist:

theconservativemom:

stoned-feminist:

theconservativemom:

(I will probably never say that again lol)

I’ve only done about 30 mins of Mike Brown research. So far it looks like I’m siding with the police officer. What am I missing here? Where is the damning evidence?

Reasons I am so far on the officer side: autopsy revealed he was shot from the front,…

Two shots to the top of the head. Unless Wilson could levitate, thats not a defensive shot. Brown was executed.

Or Brown was charging him? Open your mind a bit. All the evidence has not been released

30 feet away. Unarmed. Eye witness accounts say he wasn’t charging him. That’s the information that IS out there. And just think about this. The police released a video in which Mike Brown has an altercation with a store clerk, even though Wilson had no prior knowlege of said altercation. Tje inly info we do have is eye witness accounts, but those get ignored because, you know, the witnesses were black. My point is this, instead of actual evidence about the case. The ferguson police decided to release a non relevant video in an attenpt to call Mike Browns character into question. This is what the police department actually gave us. And if you believe two shots to the top of the head and most of the other shots in the arm (as if to be covering up) from thirty feet away was justified. Sure. You do you.

Eye witness accounts also said he was shot from behind, but the autopsy revealed that was untrue. It’s not that he’s black, it’s that he has already proved himself as a liar.

From what I’ve read Wilson did now about the robbery and that’s why he stopped them, they for the description and were walking in the same direction and vicinity as the robbers. (Because they were the robbers) please include sources to your claims. Shots are justified when your reaching for an officers gun.
stoned-feminist

stoned-feminist:

theconservativemom:

(I will probably never say that again lol)

I’ve only done about 30 mins of Mike Brown research. So far it looks like I’m siding with the police officer. What am I missing here? Where is the damning evidence?

Reasons I am so far on the officer side: autopsy revealed he was shot from the front,…

Two shots to the top of the head. Unless Wilson could levitate, thats not a defensive shot. Brown was executed.

Or Brown was charging him? Open your mind a bit. All the evidence has not been released

cristallo83

cristallo83:

theconservativemom:

Dead hahahahahahahaha

I love this, saying it like it means white people don’t riot. Um you do…only it’s over stupid stuff…

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2011/1110/Penn-State-riot-Students-react-to-Joe-Paterno-firing

Did you even read the article….?